PDI 2009 ISDP LAC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 28(6): 604-610
2008
© 2008 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tian, J.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tian, J.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, T.

Clinical

PERIPHERAL RESISTANCE MODULATES THE RESPONSE TO VOLUME OVERLOAD IN PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PATIENTS

Jun-Ping Tian1,2, Feng-He Du2, Li-Tao Cheng1, Xin-Kui Tian1, Jonas Axelsson3 and Tao Wang1

Division of Nephrology,1 Peking University Third Hospital; Division of Cardiology,2 Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Divisions of Renal Medicine and Baxter Novum,3 Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Correspondence to: T. Wang, Division of Nephrology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, P.R. China. wangt{at}bjmu.edu.cn

{diamondsuit} Background: Volume overload is thought to be the most important cause of hypertension in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. However, there is also evidence that normalization of volume overload is not always accompanied by a drop in blood pressure (BP). In the present study, we hypothesized that dysregulation of peripheral resistance due to endothelial dysfunction would constitute an important determinant of BP response in overhydrated PD patients.

{diamondsuit} Methods: We performed an observational, prospective cohort study including all prevalent PD patients at the Peking University Third Hospital between 1 June 2006 and 30 November 2006. After baseline measurements, including echocardiography and bioelectrical impedance analysis, patients fulfilling inclusion criteria were reevaluated after 2 months of follow-up. All patients that exhibited significant changes in BP and extracellular water (ECW) between 2 visits were asked to undergo a second ultrasound. These patients were then divided into group A (parallel change between BP and ECW; n = 12) and group B (paradoxical change between BP and ECW; n = 10).

{diamondsuit} Results: The cohort included 22 patients (13 males) with a mean age of 59 ± 13 years, on dialysis for 23.3 ± 32.6 months. There were no baseline differences between groups A and B. However, while patients in group A significantly increased their cardiac output, total peripheral resistance remained stable. In group B, cardiac output did not change significantly but total peripheral resistance decreased significantly.

{diamondsuit} Conclusion: In PD patients, a significant increase in fluid volume is not necessarily linked to a significant increase in BP. Rather, the change in total peripheral resistance was found to be the most important determinant of the extent to which increased fluid volume affected BP.

KEY WORDS: Hypertension; fluid overload; volume status; total peripheral resistance.

Received 3 August 2007; accepted 6 March 2008.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 2008 by Multimed Inc.