OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term viability of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) to that of hemodialysis (HD). DESIGN: Retrospective study of patients of our institution starting dialysis between January 1, 1981, and December 31, 1993, and surviving for at least 2 months. PATIENTS: Five hundred and seventy-eight new patients (51.3% on CAPD and 48.6% on HD). MAIN OUTCOMES STUDIED: Cox-adjusted assessment of patient and technique survival, and of technique success. Differences in results for two successive periods of time. RESULTS: Patient survival did not differ between CAPD and HD after adjusting for age and comorbidity, and significantly improved in the second part of the follow-up (1987-1993). Technique failure was significantly higher on CAPD, in which it was inversely related to age. The probability of a patient continuing on the first method of dialysis ("technique success") was significantly lower on CAPD than on HD, but the difference decreased progressively with age and disappeared in patients > or = 75 years. CONCLUSION: CAPD is as effective as HD in preserving life in uremic patients in the long-term, and gives better results in the older elderly. In adults, the lower technique success rate may not be a problem for patients with access to a good transplantation program; for others, this drawback must be weighed against the advantages of home treatment.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Viglino, L. Neri, S. Alloatti, G. Cabiddu, R. Cocchi, A. Limido, G. Marinangeli, R. Russo, U. Teatini, and F. P. Schena Analysis of the factors conditioning the diffusion of peritoneal dialysis in Italy Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3601 - 3605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Termorshuizen, J. C. Korevaar, F. W. Dekker, J. G. van Manen, E. W. Boeschoten, and R. T. Krediet Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis: Comparison of Adjusted Mortality Rates According to the Duration of Dialysis: Analysis of the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis 2 J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2003; 14(11): 2851 - 2860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Margetts and D. N. Churchill Acquired Ultrafiltration Dysfunction in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2002; 13(11): 2787 - 2794. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. C. Winkelmayer, R. J. Glynn, M. A. Mittleman, R. Levin, J. S. Pliskin, and J. Avorn Comparing Mortality of Elderly Patients on Hemodialysis versus Peritoneal Dialysis: A Propensity Score Approach J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2002; 13(9): 2353 - 2362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Gokal Peritoneal Dialysis in the 21st Century: An Analysis of Current Problems and Future Developments J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2002; 13(90001): S104 - 115. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. VAN BIESEN, R. C. VANHOLDER, N. VEYS, A. DHONDT, and N. H. LAMEIRE An Evaluation of an Integrative Care Approach for End-Stage Renal Disease Patients J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2000; 11(1): 116 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				K. J. Jager, M. P. Merkus, E. W. Boeschoten, F. W. Dekker, P. Stevens, and R. T. Krediet Dialysis in the Netherlands: the clinical condition of new patients put into a European perspective Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 1999; 14(10): 2438 - 2444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. BLEYER, J. M. BURKART, G. B. RUSSELL, and P. L. ADAMS Dialysis Modality and Delayed Graft Function after Cadaveric Renal Transplantation J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 1999; 10(1): 154 - 159. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Copyright © 1996 by Multimed Inc.